Dick Cheney received quite the reception in Vancouver last night. Promoting his book at a $500-per-ticket event, attendees were welcomed by a perpetually angry crowd demanding Cheney be arrested for war crimes (with no evidence, of course). In an ironic twist, these people, supposedly protesting violence, managed to knock several people attending the event over, despite a large police presence and a chain of police officers separating the protesters from the pathway the attendees used to enter the event.
I’m convinced that these people travel around looking for things to protest. And these protests are ugly; they’re not the typical protests where people stand still peacefully holding signs. These people get in your face, and loudly yell very judgemental things like “do you have no moral compass?” By now, it should be quite evident that the title of this post is sarcastic. These people, liberals, of course, do not show a good example. This kind of behaviour makes all liberals seem crazy, but I’m sure these people represent only a small portion of the liberal population. So, I ask reasonable liberals to distance themselves from these lunatics and denounce their behaviour. Demonstrating that you resort to questionable tactics to make your point is not a good way to get people on your side, in my opinion. In fact, I would bet that average people dismiss the opinions of radicals.
While I’m on the topic of protesting, I will address the protests over the oil pipeline that is proposed to be built between Hardisty, Alberta and Houston, Texas. Some of the protesters in this case, as well, resorted to questionable tactics to get their point across. Acts of defiance, with the intent of getting arrested, just to make a point, does not, in my opinion, make any point other than “I’m mentally ill.” What sensible person would actually volunteer to be arrested for naught but symbolism? Not one, I reckon. There are legitimate concerns about this pipeline, including the potential (but unlikely) risk of the contamination of the Ogallala Aquifer, which was, in fact, raised by the Republican governor of Nebraska. To me, it seems counter-productive to protest in such a way, because these people are radicals, and their actions do not reflect well on their credibility. As I said before, average people likely do not take their views very seriously.
Which is also a reason why I believe the Tea Party movement has gained such momentum. Not only does the Tea Party represent a common sense approach to solving the USA’s financial problems, but Tea Party protests are also civil (despite their depiction in the increasingly irrelevant mainstream media). So, the Tea Party movement, unlike certain liberal protesters, are showing a good example.